Podiums Féminins à La Ronde des Plages – Menton (20 Mai 2012)

Malgré la couleur du ciel, la 28ème édition du 10 km de « Menton Marathon Athlétisme » a réussi à déplacer pratiquement autant de coureurs que l'édition record de 2011, courue quant à elle sous un soleil radieux. Il est vrai que, comme cette année, le nombre de dossards attribués était déjà limité à 1200. Il n'en reste pas moins vrai que le parcours extra plat, en A/R sur le bord de mer, idéal pour un chrono (pour peu que la fraîcheur soit de la partie), est d'un attrait indéniable pour un coureur sur route.

Podium Féminin avec, à droite, Christine Morfin (photo Menton Marathon Athlétisme)

 
Avec 10 athlètes à l'arrivée, l'ASPTT Nice se distingue particulièrement avec ses représentantes, lesquelles remportent le challenge club FFA femmes avec Christine Morfin, Corinne Laudicina et Michela Albertario, devant l'AS Monaco. En individuel, Christine Morfin-Bourlat s'offre la 3ème marche sur le podium scratch, Jocelyne Gaignebet se classe 2ème V3 et Michael Rovere finit dans le top 10 (8ème scratch).
 
A noter la participation de Jacky Charpentier...le président de la section aurait-il eu le souci d'assurer lui-même la parité parfaite avec 5 hommes et 5 femmes à l'arrivée...
 
Résultats ASPTT Nice (1012 classés) :
 Clt   Temps                                                        Ecart      km/h  Clt Cat   Clt Sx   Ecart F
     8 0:35:19 ROVERE Michael                       0:03:33 16,98   6 SEM      8 M
  52 0:38:49 GONZALEZ-VEGA David           0:07:03 15,45 32 SEM   50 M
  99 0:40:11 TAOUIL Youssef                         0:08:25 14,93 53 SEM   97 M
135 0:41:09 MORFIN-BOURLAT Christine  0:09:23 14,58   1 V2F       3 F    0:04:32
294 0:45:15 LAUDICINA Corinne                  0:13:29 13,25   9 V1F     17 F    0:08:38
315 0:45:42 ALBERTARIO Michela               0:13:56 13,12 11 V1F     22 F    0:09:05
480 0:49:01 GAIGNEBET Jocelyne               0:17:15 12,24   2 V3F     48 F    0:12:24
490 0:49:11 CHARPENTIER Jacky               0:17:25 12,19 12 V3M 439 M
563 0:50:53 LOPEZ Laura                              0:19:07 11,79 25 V1F    68 F     0:14:16
598 0:51:47 COWIL Edouard                         0:20:01 11,58 21 V3M 518 M
 
Résultats complets: http://www.menton-marathon.com/
 
Pierre

Comments

[Visiteur]

jan12Fatiha Elmouktafi Ohlala, le Bastia 2.0!Ayant quitte9 la ville depuis sermptbee 09, je n'e9tais meame pas au courant mais c'est tant mieux ils gagnent en lisibilite9 et il e9tait temps que ce logo impossible e0 inte9grer sur tous les visuels ( et j'en sais quelque chose graphiste pendant un AN dans la boite e0 laquelle la ville confie la quasi totalite9 de ses projets en Corse!).Si c'est OK pour la lisibilite9 et le renouveau, je ne suis pas trop d'accord avec le maire, mais jamais personne ne le comprends celui la .

[Visiteur]

I came here to say that I really apecaripted Jay Rosen's entertaining lecture and perspective on the news and the internet and how things have evolved. Sounds like for the better. In the last interviews ( Zuckerman/Larson) Chris,much more than a simple NYTimes reader-lover, was starting to wonder whether the NYT was relevant or needed anymore ( if I got that right) and both Z and L pushed back YES! and I agreed. I have been reading that paper in it's ink and paper form for many many years and I still miss it when it does not appear in my mailbox. I go to it's web version as well and though I am getting used to that- I prefer the paper- even stale. Brendan the blogmeister for ROS, asked us this, seemingly ages ago, when we discussed this first. Yet I would not give up the blogs and want to say how they have changed my life and my involvement. Rosen and the others note this general phenomenon which is all to the good. We have the ability now to become more active participants and this brings changes.Anyway I am glad that Chris asked those questions at the end about the NYTimes. I cannot say that I am uncritical or not disappointed, but I agree with Rosen that the NYTimes is unique and a treasure and now I worry that they will die for lack of air. Or maybe they will do top down (second choice for survival) better than anyone and surprise us. The more air (participation by readers) will change the NYTimes as we have known it much more than the latter. Anyway I am not letting go yet- and not out of stubbornness.Nother-So happens that I am cleaning out my garage and I (a hopeless saver) have a pile of yellowing New York Times from 9/11/01 and the days following plus from spring 2003 when we actually invaded Iraq. I can't bring myself to throw them out before flipping through- at least to look at some of the awesome front page color photos. But without looking more deeply yet I do remember that even with Judith Miller reporting the editorials were dead set against the war and there were many op-ed contributers who also were against (but I think not Bill Keller). I will get back to you on that. It's interesting how we remember and what we remember. I do remember that across the board there was pro and con discussion. And the fact is that many very bright people were taken for a ride by this president and believed that he needed backing and would never take us into a war precipitously. He was the one who betrayed us. But that is NOT to say that the media ( investigative reporting, not opinion) did not let us down. I don't know if revenue and readership had anything to do with it but it is true that they are human and got swept up.I was troubled by Colin Powell's presentation at the UN. Manymuch brighter and more knowledgeable also bought it. Though I was against going to war but it seemed to me at the time that he made a strong case against Saddam. As well, the administration, it seemed, held so much secret information close to itself that it was a matter of trust about what we did not or could not know. Still William Safire in his columns seemed like a fool to me until the day he left the NYT. Still is WAS the job of the press to question and it did not for the most part.Rosen suggests that with the blogs being so strong today- this would not happen.BTW- I really enjoyed Josh Marshall (Talking Points Memo) in his bathrobe days. Now I see he is a big operation by comparison and I have to look to find him. I am a big fan and happy to see his well deserved success but I loved the simple site in those bathrobe days.

[Visiteur]

the intelligence was very cesolly held (as opposed to the current mortgage crisis) and consequently ite2€™s easy for the media to be manipulated.Well, Ie2€™m just an ordinary citizen and I had the information that weapons inspectors were not finding anything. I also watched Colin Powelle2€™s speech at the UN and I was sure at the time that the information/evidence that he put forth would not win him a case in small claims court. I was watching CSPAN when General Kinseki said we needed at least a few hundred thousand troops. I could go on and on. This was not cesolly held information!The media cherry picked ite2€™s stories just as the administration cherry picked the intelligence. Personally I watched in a state of fascinated horror as the media beat the drums of war and eventually I came to a simple conclusion, human nature trumps all. Jaye2€™s explanation for the mediae2€™s actions paints them as an objective entity mistakenly succumbing to authority, but the truth is, the media is made up of individuals. Individuals who on a personal level felt violated by the terrorists on 911 (and were reactionary) and individuals who on a professional level would rather be reporting on a war than a rise in shark attacks on Florida beaches.Bush proudly declares himself a e2€œwar president.e2€9d Done2€™t you think these individuals in the media want to declare themselves e2€œwar reporters ? They are just as wrapped up in their legacy.Of course ite2€™s also true that the ratings go up and more newspapers are sold during wartime, as opposed to shark time.I knew we were screwed as soon as the major news organization agreed to be embedded (or as I like to say, in bed with) the Army. Your gonna pay for that access, one way or another!Thanks again for letting us in our the class.

[Visiteur]

Well I have been reading and it goes on and on ( from the above link) dusnissicg this episode and I do not know where we end up except it seems to me that I may agree with RC21 ( for once) and that citizen journalism and mainstream media journalism can both be irresponsible and neither has enough of an understanding of the fires they can cause in this volatile political atmosphere (and so no sense of responsibility in terms of the good of the country). As well we cannot complain when candidates are scripted. Obama dares not to be so.Australia's Blue Mountains are covered with bluish Eucalyptus trees ( thus the name) which during a certain season release volatile oils which set off brushfires. Our political season is like that- the air is just filled with volatile oils.

[KelsiemubIH]

Why there is so lot of spam on your website?!
Where is exit?!